How does the LTER network in fact act as a functioning network? What properties of sites promote their contribution to network function? Answering these questions can help in decision making to (1) increase the integration of the US LTER network and (2) promote the LTER as a paradigm for scientific research coordination. We have begun addressing these questions before ASM 2006, and propose to continue and expand upon our earlier efforts. These efforts will accomplish the following objectives: 1. Improve the quality of information on publications by LTER scientists and characteristics of sites, during the quality assurance procedure for the analysis. 2. Characterize the changes in network structure over the history of the U.S. LTER through distributions of multi-site publications with the expectation that the network has become more coordinated and has developed stronger links. 3. Determine correspondence of network structure and site characteristics with the expectation that some sites are more active in their involvement in multi-site products and these have common characteristics. 4. Prepare a manuscript to summarize these results for promotion of the LTER concept and suggest strategies for improving network coordination. 5. Consider value of a proposal to continue efforts and initiate proposal.
Top Stories
Gradient of Soil Fertilization Helps Tundra Shrubs Expand Across the Arctic
Oceanography’s Rhythm: The Cadence of Life Aboard the RV Revelle
Welcome to the Woods: New Beginnings in New Hampshire
There’s always a chance something amazing will happen
Unintentional Oasis – An Accidental Urban Wetland in the Sonoran Desert
Grassland birds show resilience in the face of drought
Positive effect of fiddler crabs on saltmarsh grass reverses in expanded range
Adelie penguins go hungry as climate change limits their prey
Importance and Unanticipated Use of Biological Collections in Long-Term Ecological Research
Announcing ltertools: An R Package By and For the LTER Community