A Network of Sites
Research within the LTER Network is place-based, grounded in the deep knowledge that LTER scientists accrue from investigating the same ecosystems for decades. At each site, a core group of scientists identifies the major ecological or social-ecological questions that demand long-term study and plans a program of research for each six-year renewal.
That plan typically incorporates:
- a conceptual model,
- a core set of observations,
- experiments designed to reveal not-yet-understood processes or mechanisms, and
- modeling to help integrate new information and test current understanding
- an outreach effort intended to inform and engage stakeholders in the research conducted at the site.
Those basic elements form the nucleus on which a much broader research program grows. At each site, dozens of scientists from diverse disciplines capitalize on the historical and geographic context offered by an LTER project. They propose independent studies that depend on LTER data and experiments. The concentration of knowledge and creativity attracts graduate students and postdoctoral fellows who want to refine their craft in such a collaborative environment.
At many sites, a university, non-governmental organization, or other federal agency maintains the physical site, while the National Science Foundation funds the majority of the research program, allowing each partner to accomplish much more than they could alone.
Funding and Support
The LTER Network receives its greatest funding from NSF, but other Federal agencies such as the USDA Forest Service and Agricultural Research Services, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the US Geological Survey, the US Environmental Protection Agency, and the US Department of the Interior’s National Park Service and Fish and Wildlife Service also support various projects at site and network levels.
Funding is provided by NSF in the form of renewable six-year grants, which are independently peer-reviewed and renewed based on the quality of the proposed science. NSF conducts rigorous reviews of sites at the midpoint of each grant cycle, as well as a comprehensive review of the entire Network every 10 years.
Although NSF funds each LTER project independently, the Network is structured to encourage cross-site comparisons, syntheses, and shared learning. Until 2015, an NSF-funded LTER Network Office facilitated both Network coordination and data archiving. In 2015, the Environmental Data Initiative was launched to bring LTER-style data management and curation to a wider community of ecologists and a new Network Communications Office began managing synthesis working groups and other Network communication and coordination, based at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS). In 2019, the Network Communications Office was renamed simply the LTER Network Office.
Synthesis working groups, funded through regular open competitions, promote cross-site and cross-network collaboration, stimulate creative thinking, and encourage reuse of valuable data.
The LTER Network maintains a strong tradition of self-governance through four Network-wide standing committees and a series of smaller appointed committees and project teams.
See our listing of all active committees.
The Principal Investigator from each LTER site serves on the Science Council, which provides scientific direction and vision to the LTER Network. Representatives from the Information Management (IMC); and Education and Outreach (EOC); and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Committees, as well as the Executive Directors of the Network Communications Office and the Environmental Data Initiative, hold non-voting posts on the Science Council.
A rotating Executive Board carries on the day-to-day business of the Network. Each PI serves a 3-year rotation on the Executive Board, which meets monthly and is empowered to act on behalf of the Science Council. The Chair of the Science Council oversees the activities of the Executive Board and serves as — or appoints liaisons to — NSF, other agencies, associations, networks, the public, and to Network committees.