How does the LTER network in fact act as a functioning network? What properties of sites promote their contribution to network function? Answering these questions can help in decision making to (1) increase the integration of the US LTER network and (2) promote the LTER as a paradigm for scientific research coordination. We have begun addressing these questions before ASM 2006, and propose to continue and expand upon our earlier efforts. These efforts will accomplish the following objectives: 1. Improve the quality of information on publications by LTER scientists and characteristics of sites, during the quality assurance procedure for the analysis. 2. Characterize the changes in network structure over the history of the U.S. LTER through distributions of multi-site publications with the expectation that the network has become more coordinated and has developed stronger links. 3. Determine correspondence of network structure and site characteristics with the expectation that some sites are more active in their involvement in multi-site products and these have common characteristics. 4. Prepare a manuscript to summarize these results for promotion of the LTER concept and suggest strategies for improving network coordination. 5. Consider value of a proposal to continue efforts and initiate proposal.
Top Stories
LTER at AGU, 2024
New DataNugget: Do urchins flip out in hot water?
From Species Richness to Ecosystem Resilience: a Synthesis Study of Marine Consumer Nutrient Supply
Love writing about science? Now accepting applications for our 2024 LTER Graduate Writing Fellows program!
A changing Arctic drives a new generation of research
Measuring Methane in 4D: Tree Fluxes at Harvard Forest
Shaped by fire: the Bonanza Creek LTER
Renewed funding for the LNO prioritizes synthesis, broadening participation, and mentorship
It begins with quality data: non-LTER student uses SBC LTER data to learn R, presents work at ESA
Science at the Top of the World, or, 48 Hours at Beaufort Lagoon Ecosystems LTER